<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why a Distinctive Culture Matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philcooke.com/power_of_culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philcooke.com/power_of_culture/</link>
	<description>Change Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Winkler Burke</title>
		<link>http://philcooke.com/power_of_culture/#comment-9217</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Winkler Burke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcooke.vintom.com/power_of_culture#comment-9217</guid>
		<description>Right on Phil,

See www.brusselsjournal.com for conservative thought regarding the multi-culti war from Brussels.

See this piece: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4308 regarding how a visionary of the 1960&#039;s said that liberal or progressive efforts are 1) destructive to Western Enlightenment and 2) never satisfied with destruction and 3) never reach utopia because 4) man&#039;s nature doesn&#039;t change to make such utopias work because 5) the world and humans are God&#039;s creation.

Interesting ideas.  The visionary:  Eric Voegelin, from an article by Thomas F. Bertonneau.

Voegelin said that a mature person had &quot;openness to Divine Ground.&quot;  Whereas nasty liberals were intolerant and required strict adherence to dogma.

Voegelin always pointed to Western Enlightenments plasticity within limits, i.e. we agree to a flexible orthodoxy, but that orthodoxy, by definition, has limits that must not be crossed.

Liberalism&#039;s totalitarian PC goal is to destroy Western Enlightenment&#039;s orthodoxy.  And what is that orthodoxy?  Greek-Jewish-Christian traditions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Phil,</p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.brusselsjournal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.brusselsjournal.com</a> for conservative thought regarding the multi-culti war from Brussels.</p>
<p>See this piece: <a href="http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4308" rel="nofollow">http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4308</a> regarding how a visionary of the 1960&#8242;s said that liberal or progressive efforts are 1) destructive to Western Enlightenment and 2) never satisfied with destruction and 3) never reach utopia because 4) man&#8217;s nature doesn&#8217;t change to make such utopias work because 5) the world and humans are God&#8217;s creation.</p>
<p>Interesting ideas.  The visionary:  Eric Voegelin, from an article by Thomas F. Bertonneau.</p>
<p>Voegelin said that a mature person had &#8220;openness to Divine Ground.&#8221;  Whereas nasty liberals were intolerant and required strict adherence to dogma.</p>
<p>Voegelin always pointed to Western Enlightenments plasticity within limits, i.e. we agree to a flexible orthodoxy, but that orthodoxy, by definition, has limits that must not be crossed.</p>
<p>Liberalism&#8217;s totalitarian PC goal is to destroy Western Enlightenment&#8217;s orthodoxy.  And what is that orthodoxy?  Greek-Jewish-Christian traditions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

