<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why an Online Presence Adds an Important Feature To Your Visibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philcooke.com/Nielsen_online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philcooke.com/Nielsen_online/</link>
	<description>Change Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Reid</title>
		<link>http://philcooke.com/Nielsen_online/#comment-3502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcooke.vintom.com/Nielsen_online#comment-3502</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, Phil. - when IPTV really takes off, This is a major windfall opportunity for the graphic design world. Man, are they going to be busy...the websites will have to immediately compete with the look and feel of the major networks and cable channels in order to keep the continuity. Mostly because the web-page will be 1 click away on the same HD-screen. From NBC to MSNBC.com in 3 seconds. Or, perhaps with the web-interaction as a border/frame, and the broadcast picture nestled in the middle. Is the rest of the internet world anticipating this wave? The TV sets may be web-ready, but are the websites truly ready for Primetime??? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Phil. &#8211; when IPTV really takes off, This is a major windfall opportunity for the graphic design world. Man, are they going to be busy&#8230;the websites will have to immediately compete with the look and feel of the major networks and cable channels in order to keep the continuity. Mostly because the web-page will be 1 click away on the same HD-screen. From NBC to MSNBC.com in 3 seconds. Or, perhaps with the web-interaction as a border/frame, and the broadcast picture nestled in the middle. Is the rest of the internet world anticipating this wave? The TV sets may be web-ready, but are the websites truly ready for Primetime??? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Smythe</title>
		<link>http://philcooke.com/Nielsen_online/#comment-3503</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Smythe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcooke.vintom.com/Nielsen_online#comment-3503</guid>
		<description>Phil, on the graph I&#039;d like to see the breakdown of internet-video vs. internet-text.  We&#039;re seeing a great difference between our written blog/essays and our podcasts (just audio).  Given the statistics on reading, does your &quot;Online Presence&quot; really equate to YouTube for religious sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, on the graph I&#39;d like to see the breakdown of internet-video vs. internet-text.  We&#39;re seeing a great difference between our written blog/essays and our podcasts (just audio).  Given the statistics on reading, does your &quot;Online Presence&quot; really equate to YouTube for religious sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://philcooke.com/Nielsen_online/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philcooke.vintom.com/Nielsen_online#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dan Rupple from Seriously Funny Entertainment sent me this note about the post:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  This day part ratings is very revealing, telling us a lot about the profile of the various media users.  Radio is obvious: AM drive for listeners STARTING their day in their cars on their way to work.  TV peaking at prime time as people are WRAPPING UP  their day at home.  But Internet usage is high while we are ABOUT our day.  We are hitting the Internet while we are at work, at school or waiting in a check-out line.  What does this say about the programming that is being consumed on line?  1) Internet content needs to be brief.  The active user has an extremely limited time for viewing…a quick comedy pick-me-up before a meeting; a short sound bite news update as I rush to class; or a 60 second movie trailer before I decide what to do with a Friday night.  2) Internet content needs to be mobile.  People are on the run.  The days of desktop computer has given way to laptops.  Phone booths to the cell phone.  And now iPods to the iPhone.  As a digital media content provider, this is terrific substantiation of the difference of producing for television versus Internet. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dan Rupple - Seriously Funny Entertainment &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dan@SeriouslyFunny.TV     &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan Rupple from Seriously Funny Entertainment sent me this note about the post:</p>
<p>  This day part ratings is very revealing, telling us a lot about the profile of the various media users.  Radio is obvious: AM drive for listeners STARTING their day in their cars on their way to work.  TV peaking at prime time as people are WRAPPING UP  their day at home.  But Internet usage is high while we are ABOUT our day.  We are hitting the Internet while we are at work, at school or waiting in a check-out line.  What does this say about the programming that is being consumed on line?  1) Internet content needs to be brief.  The active user has an extremely limited time for viewing…a quick comedy pick-me-up before a meeting; a short sound bite news update as I rush to class; or a 60 second movie trailer before I decide what to do with a Friday night.  2) Internet content needs to be mobile.  People are on the run.  The days of desktop computer has given way to laptops.  Phone booths to the cell phone.  And now iPods to the iPhone.  As a digital media content provider, this is terrific substantiation of the difference of producing for television versus Internet. </p>
<p>Dan Rupple &#8211; Seriously Funny Entertainment </p>
<p><a href="mailto:Dan@SeriouslyFunny.TV">Dan@SeriouslyFunny.TV</a>     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

